Florida Appellate Court Concludes that Motions for Leave to Amend to Add a Punitive Damages Claim Require a Pre-Ruling Hearing

In WG Evergreen Woods SH, et al. v. Fares, the Florida Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether Florida Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 1.190(f) required the trial court to hold a hearing before allowing the plaintiff leave to amend its complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. The plaintiff in the action was the estate of a man named Donald DeVore, who was a resident at the defendant’s assisted living facility. At the facility, he received occupational and physical therapy to improve his strength. He was also permitted to use the pool and the hot tub. One day, a staff member found DeVore alone and unresponsive in the hot tub. It was later determined that he suffered a heart attack and consequently died.

The estate sued the defendant for negligence and wrongful death, seeking compensatory damages. In its complaint, the estate alleged that the decedent’s medical conditions indicated that he should not be allowed to use the hot tub and that despite assurances from the defendant, the decedent often used the hot tub and pool without assistance or supervision. They alleged that the decedent’s ultimate cause of death was drowning.

After the litigation progressed for one year, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. Pursuant to FRCP 1.190(f), the plaintiffs included a copy of the proposed amended complaint. The amendment would add 18 new sections, including affidavits from the plaintiff’s experts, an autopsy report, deposition transcripts, and more.

The defendant opposed the motion for leave to amend, stating that the proffer did not include evidence that would substantiate the plaintiff’s request for punitive damages. The defendant made two separate requests for a hearing to further examine this issue, but the lower court denied the request and granted the motion to add the claim for punitive damages. It reasoned that the proffer of evidence supported the punitive damages claim, and the court was merely ruling on the plaintiff’s right to plead a punitive damages claim, rather than whether the plaintiff was entitled to receive punitive damages.

On appeal, the reviewing court first outlined the statutory framework for seeking punitive damages against assisted living facilities, detailed in Florida Statutes Section 429.297. The court interpreted this section as contemplating a hearing as part of the overall procedure that must be followed when a party wants to add a punitive damages claim. The court described the lower court’s failure to conduct a hearing as a violation of the defendant’s due process right and remanded the case with instructions to the lower court to hold a hearing on whether the plaintiff had provided a sufficient proffer of evidence to support a claim for punitive damages.

If you or a loved one have suffered injuries as a result of a negligent or reckless assisted living facility or nursing home, you may be entitled to compensation. The dedicated and compassionate nursing home abuse lawyers at Lusk, Drasites & Tolisano have assisted many Southwest Florida families with seeking justice after discovering that a loved one was subjected to unthinkable treatment. Serving clients in Fort Myers, Naples, and Cape Coral, we provide a free consultation to help you learn about your rights. Contact us now at 1-800-247-7442 or contact us online to get started.

Related Posts:

Florida Appellate Court Affirms Dismissal with Prejudice of 911 Negligence Lawsuit

Florida Appellate Court Upholds Trial Court Order Binding New Condo Owner to Former Owner’s Contractual Agreements

Florida Appellate Court Denies Motion for New Trial Based on Juror’s Social Media Postings

Contact Information